Marcum v. Westside Auto Pros
December 4, 2025
When testimony conflicts with the evidence, credibility becomes the deciding factor.
On 9/4/2025, the Iowa Workers’ Compensation Commission issued a decision in
Marcum v. Westside Auto Pros . Deputy Jennifer S. Gerrish-Lampe ruled in favor of the defendant, who was represented by
Chris Scheldrup of Corridorlaw Group Iowa, P.C.
In her decision, Deputy Gerrish-Lampe found that Marcum’s lack of credibility undermined his efforts to prove that his symptoms were related to a workplace injury. Throughout the litigation process, the claimant—a truck driver who alleged that he injured his right shoulder, right arm, and neck after an accident at work—repeatedly offered inconsistent and contradictory testimony. This testimony, instead of bolstering his case, only served to discredit him.
The most significant inconsistency related to the cause of the claimant’s injuries. During the hearing, Marcum insisted that a workplace accident was the cause of the injuries he suffered on 1/4/2024.
Marcum ,
File No. 24002769.01
(Arb. 9/4/2025) at 5. However, Marcum’s medical records stated that the cause of his injuries was a fall at home.
Id . at 7. He was also inconsistent when it came to establishing the sequence of events on 1/4/2024, which further weakened his case. During the hearing, he claimed that he made a phone call to his supervisor after the accident.
Id . at 5. However, the call log that he entered into evidence showed that, on the day of the accident, he actually made four phone calls to the phone number that he claimed belonged to his supervisor. Id. at 6. What’s more, the owner of Westside Auto Pros testified that the phone number in question wasn’t even the supervisors.
Id . at 5.
Taken together, these inconsistencies made Marcum an unreliable witness in the eyes of the Deputy. As she herself noted, “[i]n a situation where there are two directly competing testimonies, a determination of credibility must be made and a specific finding of fact has to be established.”
Id.
at 7. Resolving “the inconsistencies in claimant’s favor” would have required finding that multiple witnesses were lying and that Marcum’s medical provider failed to accurately document his symptoms, a prospect that the Deputy found unreasonable.
Id . In light of this, she deemed Marcum a “noncredible witness” and determined that he did not suffer a workplace injury. Id. at 14.
The ruling in Marcum makes it evident that inconsistent testimony has the potential to derail a case. Claimants should ensure that their testimony aligns with the available evidence; if they don’t, they may come across as untrustworthy to the finder of fact.
New Paragraph
A denial without proper investigation can lead to significant penalties. By: Thania Rios
Recent cases highlight how the Agency weighs key factors in determining awards. By: Thania Rios
Learn how Iowa law governs temporary work offers in workers’ compensation cases and why strict compliance is required to limit benefit exposure.
Learn when employees can seek alternate care in Iowa workers’ compensation cases and what must be proven under Iowa Code section 85.27.
Learn how correct application of the AMA Guides impacted a recent Iowa workers’ compensation decision and why impairment ratings must follow the proper standards.
Understand what functional capacity evaluations can and cannot prove in Iowa workers’ compensation cases and how they are weighed as evidence.
Two Iowa Supreme Court decisions expanded Second Injury Fund eligibility. Learn what changed and how it impacts workers’ compensation claims.
What Workers’ Compensation Is Designed to Do Workers’ compensation is a system created to provide benefits to employees who are injured while performing their job duties. In Iowa, this system is intended to offer medical care and wage replacement without requiring injured workers to prove fault. At the same time, workers’ compensation limits an employer’s exposure to lawsuits by providing an exclusive remedy in most workplace injury situations. This balance is a key feature of the system. Who Is Covered Under Iowa Workers’ Compensation Law Most employees in Iowa are covered by workers’ compensation, regardless of whether the injury occurred suddenly or developed over time. Coverage generally applies when an injury arises out of and in the course of employment. There are limited exceptions depending on the nature of the work and employment relationship. Understanding whether an injury qualifies often depends on specific facts and circumstances. Types of Benefits Available Workers’ compensation benefits in Iowa may include medical treatment related to the injury and partial wage replacement if the injury prevents an employee from working. In some cases, benefits may also address permanent impairment or long-term disability. The type and duration of benefits depend on the nature of the injury and how it affects an employee’s ability to work. Why Understanding the System Matters Many injured workers are unfamiliar with workers’ compensation until an injury occurs. Misunderstanding how the system works can lead to missed deadlines or confusion about available benefits. Learning the basics helps injured workers better navigate the process and set realistic expectations. Final Thoughts Workers’ compensation in Iowa is designed to provide support after a workplace injury, but the process can be complex. Understanding how the system works is an important first step for anyone dealing with a work-related injury. This content is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.
Learn how shoulder injuries are classified under Iowa workers’ compensation law and what that means for benefits, impairment, and claim outcomes.
Without strong objective evidence, it is very possible for claims to fail.
